Sunday, 3 February 2013

The Grim and Gravity Connection

Gravity makes getting up in the morning difficult, it’s also responsible that unpleasant kiss of the curb when you've had too much to drink. Well, gravity and alcohol is. With gravity affecting so much of our life, you would think that it was easy to figure out, but it really wasn't, and still isn't. It’s story started over 2000 years ago, and involved a surprising amount of misery and death.

A Greek Conquest

We'll start with the ancient Greek man named Aristotle. During Aristotle's’ era of the 4th century BC, death was a common occurrence, it was a time of conquest and harsh punishment. His mentors’ mentor, Socrates, was executed simply for questioning nature. Aristotle's student, Alexander the Great, had led numerous opium fuelled conquests before he suspiciously died. Suspicions that caused Aristotle to flee from Athens, fearing the same fate as Socrates. During this seemingly chaotic life of Aristotle, a fair amount of work on what we now know to be gravity was done. Aristotle realised that motion depends upon the nature of the object, in a sense that fire would go up, earth would go down. Although it seems rather mundane and basic (and wrong), Aristotle's work was a step towards gravity.


A Post-Dark Age Pandemic

After Aristotle, there was a dark age where not much happened. But the dark age did come to an end, and from the 14th to the 17th century AD, the black death bled across Europe, shattering the population. Amidst the plagued cities and dropping bodies, Galileo Galilei was on top of the leaning tower of Pisa dropping objects. Galileo, perhaps the only scientist that we know by their first name, discovered that an object's acceleration towards the Earth does not depend on it’s mass. If it wasn't for air resistance from the atmosphere, we would see a feather fall to the ground as fast as a hammer does. Unfortunately, Galileo's’ work angered the church. A “suspect of heresy”. He was sentenced to spend the rest of his life imprisoned in his own home, where he died in 1642 - the very year our hero of gravity, Isaac Newton, was born.




A Red Cross London

As the 1665 great plague of London splattered doors with red crosses, Newton's door remained clean. Buboes were violently growing on terminally ill Londoners, but he was safe living in the country. It’s at this time that Newton is believed to have been inspired to work on gravity by an apple falling on his head. Although the tall tale of the apple is more unbelievable than Azealia Banks lyrics, a branch from the supposed apple tree now grows at the University of York. Through his work, Newton realised that the force of gravity between two objects depends on how far away they are, and how much they weigh. So, this is why the Earth has an atmosphere but the Moon doesn't, as the Moon is too light to have a gravity strong enough to hold onto the one. More familiarly, it’s why staying stood up can be hard,  as we have to counter the Earth pulling us back down. 





That bit at the end...

The theory of gravity has had slight changes since Newton, but his work is still used and taught now. It is only extreme conditions, such as near a neutron star or when travelling 1,000,000 mph,  that Newton's work becomes invalid and the slight changes are used. However, when we look deeper and deeper, smaller and smaller, it becomes apparent that gravity still needs tweaking for particle physics. Fortunately, those small and extreme conditions are small and extreme, so Newton’s gravity is like your everyday pair of converse.


Picture of Newtons Converse
Newton's shoes?


A website with a lot of information on Galileos life:
http://galileo.rice.edu/chron/europe.html


Read More »

Friday, 4 January 2013

The Particles Have Landed

Everything that we see is made from fundamental particles. Well, that's what everyone says at least. Unfortunately, the term "fundamental particle" has become somewhat of a cliché in physics! Starting with a cliché is not a very clever thing to do as the very meaning is lost straight away, however we can fix that and keep a good tight hold of the meaning (it's important).

Fundamental particles are very interesting, but what is meant by "fundamental", and what is meant by "particle". We see what they mean via the free and friendly Google:


We get to the answer by piecing these definitions together: very small pieces of matter that form the basis of all other matter. So they actually do make everything in the universe. This is why particles should be the first step for someone learning physics.

The usual analogy that follows is to say that fundamental particles are like bricks in a building. Let's not go down that street. Let's instead opt for a more colourful analogy. Here's an analogy that you may be more familiar with:

The process of courting

With the help of some modified Minus the Bear lyrics, picture the following scenario:

10 at night you're sat in a bar,
well-dressed with a drink in hand.
A girl you know, lights up the room.

All the boys are begging for her,
trying hard to grab her beauty,
to throw some charm that won't win.

It's strange, this girl, she's looking at you
You glance up then down at her drink.
The truth is, she's got the idea.
She's got the right idea.

So, what were the fundamentals of this courting process? 

Beauty - Either as physical or personal attraction.
Charm - Courting usually has some charm.
Strange - The feeling if it starts to go well.
Up - Suggestive look (or something else), usually before...
Down - Suggestive look (or something else).
Truth - The fact of success, if it's gone well.

Courting can be done with all or just a few of these fundamentals.

The punchline of this analogy is that all of those fundamentals are actually the names of real fundamental particles, collectively known as "quarks". (Although Truth and Beauty are more commonly known as Top and Bottom.)

There are many more fundamental particles than those six quarks. But you don't need to learn them all, you just need to appreciate their importance. A good follow up to is to watch "A Crash Course in Particle Physics" by Professor Brian Cox. Professor Cox is particle physicist and former keyboard player of D:Ream (things can only get better...). He has played a large part in advancing physics in the media, and he is also one of the sexiest men in the world, according to People Magazine. Perhaps he takes part in a lot of "courting"!

Stay tuned for your next Skull particle fix.



Seattle rock band, Minus the Bear, website:
http://minusthebear.com/

Professor Cox as one of the sexiest men:
http://atlas.ch/news/2009/sexiest-physicist.html
Read More »

Sunday, 23 December 2012

The First List

The first list, List 1, is a pretty neat tour of the basics of physics. One of the most striking problems of a new comer to physics, is that to understand one topic, you need to know another. Fortunately you can learn the physics in ways that will avoid that unfortunate catch 22. The following list has been carefully constructed to make sense, and be interesting (which, honestly, it is!).

This list is best followed in numerical order. With that in mind, entry 11 should be done at the same time as the rest (as needed).

The List

  1. Particle Physics
    1. The Particles
    2. Particle Behaviour (phenomena)
  2. Mechanics (Motion)
    1. Circular and Straight Motion
    2. Motion of a State
  3. Gravity
    1. Newtons Law
    2. Strength and Potential
  4. Electromagnetism
    1. Coulombs Law
    2. Strength and Potential
  5. Electronics
    1. Current, Voltage and Resistance
    2. Statics
  6. Nuclear Physics
    1. Structure and Energy
    2. Radiation
  7. Thermodynamics
    1. Laws and Engines
    2. P, V, T and Energy relations
  8. Astrophysics
    1. Telescopes and Stars
    2. Cosmology
  9. Medical Physics
    1. Eyes and Ears
    2. Measurements and Imaging
  10. The Evolution of Physics
    1. Paradigm Shifts
  11. Mathematics
    1. Algebra and Logarithms
    2. Geometry

Future posts for List1 will be in reference to this list. If you are following this list, then keep an eye out for the relevant posts, as there will be more than one for each entry!

To construct this list, the AQA website was occasionally viewed, as the first level is at a similar level to A Level. Although AQA had a quite nice syllabus, it was rather dull and old fashioned, despite being updated in the last 5 years. This first list is intended to be self contained, however it will also do a lot for a revision list! The list is by the muon Academy, but in-case you would like to see how the AQA compare, see the following link.

AQA A-level Physics A:
http://web.aqa.org.uk/qual/gce/science/physics-a-materials.php



Read More »

Thursday, 6 December 2012

The MIT Online Lectures

"First in my class at MIT" - A line that we may be familiar with Weird Al Yankovic rapping in White and Nerdy. If you don't know Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), it's a very successful American university, and as the name suggests, it is good with it's technology. The best demonstration of MIT making good use of technology is with it's "Open Course Ware" website (OCW). The website boasts a lot of online teaching material for physics. Material that is highly applicable to our Bones Scholars.

The material presented on OCW is aimed at university students, but that in no way means that it is limited only to Bones. It could do good for Skulls to have a cheeky look at what to expect in Bones, or for a Jaw to have a quick review. There are even course materials on string theory. To focus on Bones, there is a vista of relevant work. However, due to the OCW being aimed at only their own students, there is occasionally material omitted. Thankfully, it's still good. Let's have a look at a classic physics course:

Classical Mechanics 

Classical mechanics is the physicists' bread and butter - much like what expelliarmus is to a witch or wizard. The most recent material for class. mech. on the OCW is from Autumn 2010. Let's take a look:


On the course home page we have a small explanation to who the material was provided to, this one was for first year students. On the left of the page is a syllabus, as the courses are separated into syllabuses. By selecting the topic, the material is unveiled. For this particular course, a wealth of information is provided: video lectures, lecture notes in PDF, suggested reading and learning activities. This is the case for most of the courses. This is essentially everything that you need!

By using the OCW material with the suggested material from Gerard 't Hooft's guide to be becoming a good theoretical physicist, you could advance fast. Alternatively, you could just work thought the entire physics section on the OCW!


MIT OpenCourseWare, Physics:
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/


How to become a good theoretical physicist by Gerard 't Hooft (29/11/2012 blog):
http://mmxiacademy.blogspot.co.uk/2012/11/how-to-become-good-theoretical.html


Read More »

Saturday, 1 December 2012

Impressing with Physics (Misconceptions about the Higgs)

The Higgs boson has been cycled through the media a lot recently. And, as is common with the media, a dark cloud follows has been following it around. Physics Professor, Mike Kruse, has explained some of the major parts of the dark cloud, in a little article from Duke University: "Top 5 common misconceptions about the Higgs particle"

The first misconception is, at first sight, just being a little bit pedantic about the wording:

Misconception: The Higgs particle gives other particles mass.
Correction: The masses of fundamental particles come from interactions with the Higgs field.

But this is a lesson to all of our Scholars, as it is so tempting to leave actual physics aside, in favour of a more colourful and dramatic explanation.

Theother misconceptions are a mixture of technicalities:

Misconception: The Higgs field generates the mass of everything.
Correction: The Higgs field generates the mass of about one percent of observable matter and possibly all of dark matter.


Bizarrities:

Misconception: There was a "eureka moment" for discovering the Higgs boson and the existence of the Higgs field.
Correction: There will never be eureka moments for discoveries such as the Higgs boson and the Higgs field at the Large Hadron Collider.


And good, simple, misconceptions:


 Misconception: The Higgs field is what scientists used to call the aether.
 Correction: The Higgs field isn't a medium; it's a field of energy.


Misconception: The Higgs boson creates the Higgs field.
 Correction: The Higgs field generates the Higgs boson.



So, if you are using physics to impress someone, either tell 'em it straight, or remember the truth afterwards. We all use physics to impress people, from time to time.



The full article about misconceptions:
http://today.duke.edu/2012/11/higgsmisconceptions
Read More »